Russian Federation
New data on the effect of dimethyl disulfide on hydrobionts of different systematic groups were obtained. The threshold concentrations of DMDS, established with the chronic effect of DMDS on the growth of cells of the algae Chlorella vulgaris — 0.05 mg/L, on the reproductive parameters of Ceriodaphnia affinis — 5.0 mg/L, the occurrence of pathomorphological and pathoanatomic changes in adult fish Danio rerio — 5.0 mg/L. The change in the number of cells of the green algae Chlorella vulgaris is the most sensitive test function. The established toxicological parameters can be used to determine the hazard class and adjust the standards for the content of DMDS in water.
dimethyl disulfide, algae, crustaceans, fish, toxicity
1. Beym A.M. Ekologo-toksikologicheskie kriterii reglamentacii metilsernistyh soedineniy v stochnyh vodah sul'fat-cellyuloznogo proizvodstva. M.: VNIPIEIlesprom. 1984. Vyp. 8. 34 s.
2. Dyusengaliev K.I., Saginaeva A.T., Kulbatyrov D.K. i dr. Fiziko-himicheskie harakteristiki substitov disul'fidnogo masla uglevodorodnogo syr'ya // Neftegazovoe delo. 2016. № 5. S. 125–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17122/ogbus-2016-5-125-139.
3. Koptyaev V.G. Eksperimental'nye dannye po obosnovaniyu predel'no dopustimoy koncentracii dimetilsul'fida v vodoemah // Gigiena i sanitariya. 1967. T. 32(3). S. 3–7.
4. Metodika biotestirovaniya toksichnosti vody i vodnyh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnyh vod i othodov po smertnosti i izmeneniyu plodovitosti ceriodafniy. Federal'nye reestr (FR). FR 1.39.2007.03221. M.: AKVAROS. 2007. 56 s.
5. Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vod, vodnyh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnyh vod i othodov po izmeneniyu urovnya fluorescencii hlorofilla i chislennosti kletok vodorosley. Federal'nyy reestr (FR) FR.1.39.2007.03223. M.: AKVAROS. 2007. 47 s.
6. Metody ispytaniya himicheskoy produkcii, predstavlyayuschey opasnost' dlya okruzhayuschey sredy. Ostraya toksichnost' dlya embrionov ryby. (OECD, Test No. 236:2013, MOD). M.: “Standartinform”. 2016. 30 s.
7. Metody ocenki toksicheskogo vliyaniya fitocenozov planktona na formirovanie kachestva poverhnostnyh vod sushi. Rostov na Donu: Rosgidromet, 2014. 43 s.
8. Meschakova N.M., Benemanskiy V.V. Ocenka biologicheskogo deystviya dimetildisul'fida s uchetom specificheskih otdalennyh effektov // Byulleten' Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo centra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii medicinskih nauk. 2005. № 2(40). S. 209–212.
9. Obzor rynka disul'fidnogo masla v Rossii: analit. obzor, avgust 2012 g. Issledovatel'skaya gruppa “Infomayn”. M.: Infomayn, 2012, 107 s.
10. Otchet o nauchno-issledovatel'skoy rabote po teme: “Razrabotka nauchno-obosnovannogo normativa predel'no-dopustimoy koncentracii (PDK) na dimetildisul'fida dlya vodoemov rybohozyaystvennogo znacheniya”. Borok. 2023. 71 s.
11. Pasport bezopasnosti dimetildisul'fida (№ 004111-001 (versiya 4.0). ARKEMA France, 2010. 9 c.
12. Selyuzhickiy G.V. Eksperimental'nye dannye k obosnovaniyu PDK metilmerkaptana, dimetilsul'fida i dimetildisul'fida v vozduhe rabochey zony cellyulozno-bumazhnyh predpriyatiy // Gigiena truda. 1972. № 6. S. 46–47.
13. Selyuzhickiy G.V., Garbuz A.M., Kandybor N.P. i dr. Gigiena truda v cellyulozno-bumazhnoy promyshlennosti. M.: Lesnaya promyshlennost', 1989. 216 s.
14. Chamorro M., Seijo T.E., Noling J.C. et al. Efficacy of fumigant treatments and inoculum placement on control of Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberry beds // Crop Prot. 2016. Vol. 90. P. 163–169. DOI: 0.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.020.
15. Conkle J.L., Cabrera J.A., Thomas J.E. et al. Effects of CO2 dissolution on phase distribution and degradation of dimethyl disulfide in soils under grape production // Pest. Manage Sci. 2016. Vol. 72(2). P. 349–353. DOI: 0.1002/ps.4004.
16. ECHA, 2010. Dimethyl Disulfide Registration Dossier. (https://echa.europa.eu/registration-dossier/-/registered-dossier/13671).
17. ECHA, 2012. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, November 2012. Vol. 2.1. http://echa.europa.eu/.
18. Gómez-Tenorio M.A., Zanón M.J., de Cara M. et al. Efficacy of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) against Meloidogyne sp. and three formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum under controlled conditions // Crop Prot. 2015. Vol. 78. P. 263–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.09.013.
19. Kiragosyan K., Picard M., Sorokin D. et al. Effect of dimethyl disulfide on the sulfur formation and microbial community composition during the biological H 2 S removal from sourgas streams // J. Hazard. Mater. 2020. Vol. 386. P. 121916. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121916.
20. Liang Z., An T., Li G., Zhang Z. Aerobic biodegradation of odorous dimethyl disulfide in aqueous medium by isolated Bacillus cereus GIGAN2 and identification of transformation intermediates // Bioresour. Technol. 2015. Vol. 175. P. 563–568. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.002.
21. Ljunggren G., Norberg B. On the Effect and Toxicity of Dimethyl Sulfide, Dimethyl Disulfide and Methyl Mercaptan // Acta Physiol. 2008. № 5(2–3). P. 248–255. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1943.tb02053.x.
22. Mao L., Yan D., Wang Q. et al. Evaluation of the combination of dimethyl disulfide and dazomet as an efficient methyl bromide alternative for cucumber production in China // J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014. Vol. 62(21). P. 4864–4869. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501255w.
23. Mount D.I., Norberg T.J. A seven-day life-cycle cladoceran toxicity test // Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1984. Vol. 3. P. 425–434.
24. Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve (ed. D. J. Finney). NY-London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1952. 318 p.
25. Rupp T., Oelschlagel B., Rabitsch R. et al. Flowers of Deceptive Aristolochia microstoma Are Pollinated by Phorid Flies and Emit Volatiles Known From Invertebrate Carrion // Front. Ecol. Evol., Sec. Chemical Ecology. 2021. Vol. 9. Article 658441. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.658441.
26. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry. The principals and practice of statistics in biological research. NY.: W.H. Freeman and Co, 1995. 887 p.
27. Stensmyr M.C., Urru I., Collu I. et al. Rotting smell of dead — horse arum florets // Nature. 2002. Vol. 420. P. 625–626. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/420625a.
28. Tang X., Cao A., Zhang Y. et al. Effects of soil factors on dimethyl disulfide desorption and the risk of phytotoxicity to newly-planted seedlings // Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023. Vol. 262. P. 115313. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115313.
29. Yan D., Cao A., Wang Q. et al. Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) as an effective soil fumigant against nematodes in China // PLoS ONE. 2019. Vol. 14(10). P. e0224456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224456.
30. Yu J., Land C.J., Vallad G.E., Boyd N.S. Tomato tolerance and pest control following fumigation with different ratios of dimethyl disulfide and chloropicrin // Pest. Manage Sci. 2019. Vol. 75(5). P. 1416–1424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5262.
